0.7 C
New York
3 C
Washington D.C.
Sunday, February 5, 2023

Wissing: the countries “on the train” follow one another for a ticket at 9 euros

[ad_1]

To: 07/20/2022 16:24

In the debate over the successor to the 9 euro note and its financing, Transport Minister Wissing does not see the Federal Government as responsible. Countries should see “how they want to finance it”. They see it differently.

Transport Minister Volker Wissing does not see the Federal Government as responsible for a follow-up offer for the 9 euro ticket. Instead, the responsibility for further actions rests with the federal states. “Local public transportation and fare structure is a matter for the federal states, not the federal government,” he said. ARD morning magazine. He couldn’t design the banknote at all, countries would have to.

“I can’t suddenly organize public transport on the federal side, specify fares or specify tickets,” said the FDP politician. The constitution provides otherwise.

First, the peasant criticism of the 9 euro note

When he proposed the ticket, he was heavily criticized by countries. The conference of federal state transport ministers was outraged by the proposal. “And now everyone is very excited and wants to have it permanently. Now we have to see how the federal states want to fund it,” Wissing said. The question of how to continue with a new offer after the expiry of the 9 euro note in August is above all a question of financing.

Federal states necessarily see the federal government on board. A Federal-Land working group is discussing a lawsuit, in particular with regard to a socially degressive ticket, indicated the president of the conference of transport ministers, the senator of Bremen Maike Schaefer, at the request of the agency of dpa press.

The federal government has a duty to fund public transport

“Implementation will only be possible with a massive increase in regionalization funds by the federal government,” the Greens politician stressed. Wissing obviously wanted to distract from the fact that he had no serious strategy for a lasting reversal in mobility after the €9 note. According to the regionalization law, the federal government is responsible for funding local public transport, Schaefer said.

The federal government subsidizes the 9 euro ticket, valid nationwide for all local transport, for the period from June to August with approximately 2.5 billion euros. According to Wissing, the fact that the federal government financed the 9 euro note once for three months was a proposal for economy in an attempt to mitigate the effects of the war in Ukraine. This, too, was only possible with the consent of the Bundesrat due to the competences of the federal states. The procedure decided by the conference of transport ministers of the federal states remains the same, Wissing said. According to this, “in the autumn there will be advice on how public transport structures should be repositioned”.

Succession possible from the end of the year

Wissing announced yesterday that he was considering a possible follow-up offer from the end of the year or the beginning of 2023. The Minister for Transport told the dpa news agency that he wanted to wait until early November for data on the ticket to help with the evaluation. At the moment, there are still many unanswered questions. There is a lot of speculation, but the answers to the questions are not really known. “That’s why we need the results of the assessment.”

Faced with strong demand, calls for an accompanying regulation to relieve households in the face of high inflation and promote the recovery of transport are increasing. Among other things, an annual subscription for 365 euros or a monthly subscription for 69 euros were offered for a follow-up model.

ADAC warns against pure price debate

Motoring club ADAC has raised concerns that the discussion of follow-on deals shouldn’t just be about cost. “The state must help those who find it difficult to continue to pay for public transport,” transport chairman Gerhard Hillebrand told the German Press Agency. “But it must also be able to invest sufficient funds in expansion and improvement.” Therefore, sticking to a nationwide €9 monthly subscription for everyone is not appropriate. It would then be more difficult to improve the service offer and make buses and trains more attractive in the long term.

Hillebrand explained, “For some, the cheapest deal is best because their household income is low. Others look more at price/performance ratio.” In many places there is a lack of attractive connections, reliability and flexible offers. “To make the shift from car to public transport attractive to more people at peak times, we need new investment in more frequent services, infrastructure renewal and expansion, additional vehicles and digitization.” In the countryside, there are still significant supply gaps that can hardly be reduced in the short term. “Consumers here are dependent on the car. And that can only mean that mobility by car must remain affordable. Demands to make car traffic even more expensive, for example to finance cheap public transport tickets for all, affect the reality of many people’s lives over the course of .

[ad_2]

Source www.tagesschau.de

Latest article