16 C
New York
Sunday, May 29, 2022

the liar’s triumph

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


[Der tägliche Nachrichtenüberblick aus der Hauptstadt: Schon rund 57.000 Leser:innen informieren sich zweimal täglich mit unseren kompakten überregionalen Newslettern. Melden Sie sich jetzt kostenlos hier an.]

Who do you think is more angry? The writing of “Bild” because it had subjected the publication of the “doers of confinement” to harsh self-criticism? Or the 94 scientific people and institutions who complained to the German Press Council about the article in “Bild” and Bild.de because the article gave the impression that scientists were personally responsible for coronavirus measures and not politicians. This fuels conspiracy theories and encourages hate speech against scientists, was his argument.

[Der tägliche Nachrichtenüberblick aus der Hauptstadt: Schon rund 57.000 Leser:innen informieren sich zweimal täglich mit unseren kompakten überregionalen Newslettern. Melden Sie sich jetzt kostenlos hier an.]

The Press Council Complaints Committee has now rejected all the submissions as “unfounded”. Bild’s designation of the three experts as “lockdown makers” has a core of fact. Therefore, the term “the creators of the confinement” is a permissible exaggeration, “which can be pointed and controversial, but it is covered by freedom of expression”.
Yes, it is true, freedom of expression endures and is best defended by exercising it.

questionable decision

However, the press council’s decision should raise questions. The presentation of the contribution follows the sensationalist principle that the information must serve the purpose and objective of being able to stir up emotions. “The creators of confinement” are an excellent example of this. There is no doubt that the three scientists helped establish pandemic measures with their experience. But it is because science decides on locks and their design. Politicians take on this task.

“Bild” suggested something else, the newspaper clearly wanted to create a mood, against serious science and its findings. That was also successful, the Corona liars scene, sorry, the Corona deniers were and are delighted with the article and the non-complaints.

Ignored Effect Intent

The Press Council ignored the intended effect of the article and presentation. The mistake that was made there is already evident from the fact that the “Bild” newspaper has distanced itself from its mistake.


Source link

- Advertisement -

New Articles