18.8 C
New York
Saturday, May 28, 2022

Apple files arguments against Epic Games antitrust lawsuit

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Apple files arguments against Epic Games antitrust lawsuit

Apple has presented arguments after the antitrust suit presented by epic games in the state of California. In a previous ruling, the aforementioned state judge ruled in favor of the Cupertino firm, indicating that it was was not violating California’s unfair competition law second Tim Higgins at The Wall Street Journal.

Apple said the ruling should be overturned because the judge had already found that the payment system in the application of the iPhone manufacturer was competitive.

This is the series of the first full presentation with the start of the lawsuit by Epic Games.

Apple’s presentation on Thursday before the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit They come weeks after Epic gave its own reasons for its appeal in the case that was mostly filed in favor of Apple. the US District Judge, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, had previously ruled against 9 out of 10 Epic claims. An appeals court hearing is expected later this year, with a decision unlikely for several months.

Apple said the soonest it expects a decision is the summer 2023. Meanwhile, you already got a appellate court pardon when implementing the changes in the App Store ordered by the Judge Gonzalez Rogers.

Although I found that Apple was not violating antitrust laws in mobile gaming transactions, the judge ruled that its conduct in enforcing the Anti-direction restrictions were anti-competitive under California law. He had instructed Apple to allow developers to communicate with users within their apps about alternative payment methods outside the Apple App Store.

“This court has already recognized that Apple is likely to succeed on the main issue, whether conduct that does not violate antitrust statutes can be punished as ‘unfair’ under California law, by staying the injunction pending appeal,” he said. Apple in its presentation on Thursday.

At this stage of the fight, as the two sides argue over Judge Gonzalez Rogers’ ruling, they are trying to prove legal errors in the ruling. It is a less dramatic battle than last May, when the companies’ lawyers clashed in a Courthouse in Oakland, Calif.for 16 days, and drama in which the CEOs of both companies appeared as witnesses.

At the core of the original Epic plot were claims that Apple had a inappropriate monopoly over distributing third-party software on their iPhones and forcing apps to use their own in-app payment system, which charges up to 30% commission.

In January, Epic made its own argument to the appeals court, saying the judge was wrong in her interpretation of the law and the ruling should be reversed. “The factual findings of the district court make clear that Apple’s conduct is precisely what the antitrust laws prohibit,” Epic said in filing for him.

Their fight started in August 2020when Epic introduced a alternative payment system in popular video games “Fortnite”, violating read app store rules from Apple. In response, Apple removed a “Fortnite” from the App Store and Epic introduced it at Apple’s request.

Except for the aspect of the fall that occurs on the manufacturer of the iPhone, Apple asks to confirm the decision of September. “Epic did not lose the case due to any legal error,” Apple Thursday in its more than 120-page filing. “Epic lost because it ‘overreached’ in asserting claims at the ‘borderline antitrust borders,’” he wrote, citing the September judge’s decision.

The video game maker’s case was bolstered by a number of outside groups that appeared friendly reports on behalf of Epic. In particular, 35 state attorneys general disagreed with the lower court’s findings, as did the US Department of Justice, who also weighed in on his own report. The Justice Department has been investigating the power of big tech companies, including Apple.

“The district court made a number of legal errors that could jeopardize effective antitrust enforcement, especially in the digital economy,” the court said. Justice Department in his January presentation.

Apple responds to Thursday from the Department of Justice and the current state defending “new legal positions that are accepted and facilitated by the lawsuit as antitrust.”

Apple It closed Thursday’s session higher at $174.07 and the location of the moving averages, the 70-period above the 200-period, would give us a bullish signal. Meanwhile, the Ei indicators are practically bullish.

Source link

- Advertisement -

New Articles